Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Bias? What Bias?

Via Nealenews:

Running for coverage

...Stephen Harper received the most negative coverage of the four main party leaders, even more negative than the coverage he got in the disastrous final week of the 2004 election.

Initial coverage of Paul Martin was not only less negative, it was more positive than the waning days of the last campaign, when the Prime Minister rebounded to pull out his narrow victory.


However,

The sample sizes are small...and the findings are based on reports and opinion pieces published before any major policy announcements had been made, including Harper's blockbuster pledge to reduce the hated GST.


It will be interesting to see if the Main Stream Canadian Media (MSCM) can keep their boy in power.

1 comment:

DazzlinDino said...

Conservatives always get pounded in the press, it's depressing. Here is the big problem, if he acts with passion, they call him loony or angry, and if he acts with less emotion, they call him meek and robotlike. Either way he's screwed...